In reply to:
Kevin Bass PhD MS
@kevinnbass
·
12d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with a debate on media censorship and free speech, which are significant public issues. The tone of the statement is clarifying and seeks to distance the speaker from defending CBS's actions, indicating a desire to correct a potential misunderstanding.
- The statement does not cause harm and clarifies the speaker's position, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the speaker's intent, which can foster empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misunderstanding without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges a potential mistake in how the speaker's previous words were interpreted and seeks to correct it. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.