In reply to:
🌷
@ArchHedonist
·
257d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
257d
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the motivations behind political actions related to US policy and its impact on Gaza, thus contributing to civic dialogue on international relations and humanitarian issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the motivations behind political actions, which can be seen as a neutral stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning whether actions are genuinely helpful or merely performative, encouraging deeper consideration of the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the effectiveness of current policies without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question and potentially guide public policy towards a more humanitarian approach. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning public policy and its implications. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.