In reply to:
Jack Ferminez
@JackFerminez
·
257d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
257d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
257d
The statement by @marwilliamson addresses the political risk associated with Trump and encourages individuals to vote according to their conscience, considering their state's context. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with the political landscape and voter decision-making.
- The statement does not use harmful language and encourages personal reflection, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By suggesting that individuals respond to their conscience, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead fostering a respectful dialogue about political choices. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly discuss political engagement, upholding the principle of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.