Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the reaction to the Washington Post's endorsement decision and its potential impact on journalists, highlighting the economic implications of canceling subscriptions. It encourages consideration of the broader consequences of individual actions.
- The statement strives to do no harm by cautioning against actions that might inadvertently harm journalists rather than the intended target, Jeff Bezos. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by explaining the potential consequences of canceling subscriptions, fostering empathy for journalists who might be affected. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging the anger and providing a reasoned perspective without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to encourage thoughtful consideration of actions that could impact society, particularly the journalism industry. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing the implications of a public reaction to a media endorsement. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.