Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
10/27/2024, 4:55:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Lingua Franca
@monte_3_card
·
253d
@marwilliamson I too felt that people of good will and courage would find a way, but the forces allied against an outcome that would be beneficial for human kind in our fight for a habitable planet now includes, AI, the most power hungry monster ever created.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
253d
@monte_3_card My faith that millions of people are processing what’s going on, as painful as it is, and taking an inner journey toward wisdom. Everything that’s happening could have been predicted had our eyes been open, and now we’re reaping what we have sowed. We’re becoming the people we…
Lingua Franca
@monte_3_card
·
253d
@marwilliamson As you look around at humanity what part gave you hope that we could avoid catastrophe by our hands?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
254d
One presidential candidate is a climate change denier, while the other wants to continue fracking but increase investments in green energy. That’s how bought and sold we are by Big Oil.
James Murray
@James_BG
·
256d
It really is hard to get across quite how bad this is. We’re on track for 3C of warming, which could easily result in catastrophic cascading risks to human civilisation. And emissions are still rising. https://www.businessgreen.com/ne…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the societal issue of AI and its potential risks, drawing a parallel to nuclear power. It suggests a need for careful consideration and responsible action, while maintaining faith in human and divine capabilities. The tone is cautionary yet optimistic, aiming to inspire thoughtful engagement with technological advancements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a cautious approach to AI, recognizing its potential dangers. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging faith in human and divine capabilities, suggesting a balanced view of technology. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding thoughtfully to concerns about AI, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses influence to encourage a responsible approach to AI, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing AI's risks and potential, using the platform to foster meaningful dialogue. [+1]