Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47

Score 57

@TonyClimate @guardian I definitely agree that both parties have betrayed us on the issue of the environment. I’m hardly naïve on the subject. But with one, I continue to believe we have more of a a chance.

10/27/2024, 4:59:47 PM

In reply to:

Tony Heller

@TonyClimate

253d

@marwilliamson It makes no difference which party is in the White House. Atmospheric CO2 grew at a record rate during the past four years under the leadership of Democrats. Why are you misinforming your readers @guardian ?

#ClimateScam

https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends…

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

253d

Should he win, Trump's complete denial of the climate crisis creates a horrifying prospect for the next four years. He calls it "one of the great scams."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-n…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of environmental policy and political accountability. It expresses dissatisfaction with both political parties regarding their handling of environmental issues, while suggesting a preference for one party as potentially more effective.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on expressing a viewpoint about political accountability. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the complexity of political influence on environmental issues. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by critiquing both parties without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]