Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 57
10/28/2024, 5:21:18 AM
X
In reply to:
Bill Zettler
@twitbzed
·
247d
@Smoke___Mirror @davidsirota @KamalaHarris I am a cynical bastard, 'tis true, as I suspect you are as well.

I do feel a need to speak truth even to people who don't want to hear it, but cynicism itself is not something I would wish on people.

Every time I tell @marwilliamson that she's foolish for supporting the…
Smoke and Mirrors
@Smoke___Mirror
·
247d
@twitbzed @davidsirota @KamalaHarris Not really. Children are, after all, children.

Sirota occasionally cosplays as "on the left" when he's just another in a long line of liberals foisting delusions on desperate people .

"How's that hopey-changey thing workin' out for ya?" ought to be the slogan of "The Left".
Bill Zettler
@twitbzed
·
247d
@Smoke___Mirror @davidsirota @KamalaHarris Do you relish telling children the truth about Santa Claus?

David does good work and occasionally expresses how demoralized he is with American media and the state of the American mind. I don't need to demoralize him further.
Smoke and Mirrors
@Smoke___Mirror
·
247d
@twitbzed @davidsirota @KamalaHarris Finding "hope" in one fleeting manifestation of an ever-shifting self-presentation as political performance piece seems confused to me.

Since "that" Kamala was no more substantive/real than another Kamala, what's to hope for?

Liberals, whichever form they take, are delusionary.
Bill Zettler
@twitbzed
·
247d
@Smoke___Mirror @davidsirota @KamalaHarris I don't think he's confused. I think he's fishing through the utter disaster that's Kamala Harris, her pitiful performance as VP, and her pathetic campaign for President, and trying to find hope.

He had to go back more than 4 years to do it. Who am I to crush that hope?
Smoke and Mirrors
@Smoke___Mirror
·
247d
@twitbzed @davidsirota @KamalaHarris David seems confused.

If we can identify, "this Kamala Harris" vs "that Kamala Harris" and recognize how quickly one "Kamala Harris" morphs into the "next Kamala Harris", we ought to understand that neither a chameleon nor a puppet actually has anything to offer in reality.

The statement is part of a broader conversation that critiques political figures and the nature of political hope, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is somewhat defensive and personal, suggesting a rejection of naivety in political aspirations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a conversation that includes critical language about political figures.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the broader conversation includes harsh critiques of public figures.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on personal expression. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is more of a personal assertion rather than addressing the arguments presented. [-1]