In reply to:
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar
·
247d
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar
·
247d
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar
·
247d
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar
·
247d
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar
·
247d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public issue related to immigration and national identity, referencing the Emma Lazarus poem on the Statue of Liberty in response to a comment about American exclusivity. The tone is critical and challenges the notion presented by Stephen Miller, suggesting a defense of inclusive values.
- The statement does not directly harm but challenges a potentially harmful viewpoint, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by invoking the symbolic meaning of the Statue of Liberty, which represents welcoming immigrants. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the implications of the original statement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to challenge a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.