Jake Tapper

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 67

The statement criticizes the omission of specific details about a shooting incident, suggesting it was a hate crime motivated by antisemitism. It questions the adequacy of the mayor's response, implying a lack of acknowledgment of the crime's nature.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a perceived injustice, potentially promoting awareness of antisemitism, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the privacy of the victim by not disclosing personal details, but it challenges the mayor's response, which could be seen as a critique rather than harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the mayor's response, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to more comprehensive public statements in the future. [+1]