Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by Naim Qassem, as reported, constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant geopolitical issue involving multiple nations and entities. The tone is assertive and suggests a broad conflict involving various global powers. The intent appears to be to frame the conflict as a larger international issue rather than a localized one.
- The statement could potentially escalate tensions and contribute to harm by framing the conflict as a global war, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve sensitive geopolitical issues that could impact the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it frames the conflict in a confrontational manner. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view of the conflict. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to frame the conflict in a specific way, which may not contribute to the betterment of society if it escalates tensions. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but the responsibility and integrity of using the platform could be questioned if it incites further conflict.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.