In reply to:
NAM
@22NamB
·
248d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
248d
The statement is part of a conversation about voting and political decisions, which are public issues. The tone suggests a defense of a voting decision based on larger stakes, indicating engagement in civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on explaining a decision rather than attacking others. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in dialogue by explaining a decision without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to express a personal political decision, which is a responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.