Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
11/5/2024, 1:23:31 PM
X
In reply to:
Lupo鈥檚 Dad 馃馃敟
@realimbored668
路
249d
@marwilliamson @eneldiluvio No state bars doctors from performing lifesaving care
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
路
249d
@eneldiluvio Sports is important, but a woman鈥檚 health even more so. You say he took the federal government out of the decision, but by giving it to the states they handed it over in some cases to forces extremely dangerous to women鈥檚 health and well-being.
Tres Leches
@eneldiluvio
路
249d
@marwilliamson Then vote Trump. He wants the federal govt out of these decisions. Plus he's protecting women's rights to play sports and be safe in female-only spaces.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
路
249d
I care about animals; I care about people even more. Government should not have told that man what to do with his squirrel, and it sure as hell should not be telling women what to do with our bodies.

The statement 'They sure as hell do. See Texas.' is part of a public discourse on the topic of state-level restrictions on medical care, specifically in the context of women's health and rights. The tone is assertive and suggests disagreement with the claim that no state bars doctors from performing lifesaving care, using Texas as an example.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language that could be perceived as confrontational.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on refuting a claim.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of dialogue by responding to a previous claim, but it does not provide evidence or engage in constructive criticism, which limits the potential for productive dialogue.聽[-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and addresses a public issue, but the use of strong language could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity.聽[-1]