In reply to:
Nomadtsunami14
@NaumanUsmani2
·
255d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about political representation and the consequences of ignoring public concerns. It references a specific cultural practice, Haitian voodoo, in a context that suggests a broader commentary on political and social issues.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but the mention of Haitian voodoo could be seen as perpetuating stereotypes, which may indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the reference to Haitian voodoo could be interpreted as disrespectful to cultural practices. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to highlight the importance of addressing public concerns, which can promote understanding, but it lacks empathy towards the cultural reference made.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but responds to a conversation about political suppression, which is a constructive engagement. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.