In reply to:
American Caesar 🇺🇸🌿 Constitutional Nationalist
@CivOptimist
·
255d
The statement is a reply to a conversation about political priorities and potential corruption, which are public issues. The tone is questioning, possibly indicating skepticism or a request for clarification.
- The statement engages in dialogue by questioning the original statement, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.