Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47

Score 55

@politiyogini Actually, it IS about corporations. Read the part in Vivek’s tweet about the Chevron deference decision. (I know Vivek and I like him personally, by the way) But I respect the fact that you voted for him, and I respect the fact that he won. The loyal opposition gets to have our…

11/13/2024, 7:22:47 PM

In reply to:

Artisan Well

@politiyogini

439d

@marwilliamson We the people who voted for this agenda want it to Marianne. I really respect you, but come on, this is not about corporations.

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

439d

Let me make it simple for you. This is a complicated, lovely sounding way of saying that whatever Trump and his corporate sponsors want, Vivek and Elon will make sure they get.

Vivek Ramaswamy

@VivekGRamaswamy

439d

Here’s a key point about our mission at DOGE: eliminating bureaucratic regulations isn’t a mere policy preference. It’s a legal *mandate* from the U.S. Supreme Court:
- West Virginia v. EPA (2022) held that agencies cannot decide major questions of economic or political…

The statement engages in a discussion about corporate influence and legal decisions, specifically referencing the Chevron deference and a Supreme Court decision. It acknowledges differing viewpoints and expresses respect for opposing opinions, indicating a willingness to engage in civic dialogue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a respectful tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding any form of harassment or hate speech. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging and respecting differing opinions. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue, showing respect for opposing views and avoiding personal attacks. [+1]