In reply to:
Nobody
@Nobodieknows
·
438d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
438d
Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
·
439d
The statement by @Nobodieknows lists various industries and entities often criticized for their influence on politics and policy, suggesting they are the 'corporate sponsors' in question. This engages with public discourse by addressing concerns about corporate influence in politics.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of certain industries.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more accusatory. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lists entities in a critical manner without further explanation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived issues with corporate influence, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion on corporate influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.