In reply to:
Harlan Stewart ⏹️
@HumanHarlan
·
453d
The statement is a clarification in a public discussion about AI techniques, specifically addressing a misinterpretation of the speaker's stance on deep learning. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify the speaker's long-held position on the need for advancements beyond current deep learning methods.
- The statement does no harm and is focused on clarifying a misunderstanding, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by correcting a misinterpretation without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges a potential misunderstanding and corrects it, aligning with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.