Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a public discourse about AI development and scholarly integrity. It challenges the accuracy of a claim and emphasizes the importance of reading and understanding academic work before making assertions. The tone is defensive and slightly confrontational, with a warning about potential blocking, which could be seen as a threat to open dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to correct a perceived misrepresentation, which aligns with striving to do no harm by promoting accurate discourse. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The mention of blocking could be seen as a threat, potentially undermining respectful dialogue. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement challenges the other party to engage more rigorously with the material, which aligns with constructive criticism, but the tone could be more respectful.