Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 84

@mlbaggins @HumanHarlan @ilyasut @ylecun No he doesn’t. Just a title, without reading the argument that was in that paper.

I never said it was was a dead end; never said we should abandon it. just said it should be supplemented.

Still true.

11/14/2024, 8:50:22 PM

In reply to:

Mateusz Bagiński ⏹️🔀⿻

@mlbaggins

453d

@HumanHarlan @ilyasut @ylecun Do you have a direct quote with sources where Marcus says DN is a dead end or is this an exaggeration?

Harlan Stewart ⏹️

@HumanHarlan

453d

My summary of a recent bit of AI discourse:

@ilyasut: existing techniques aren't as good as the secret techniques at my new AI startup (hi investors!)

@ylecun: See everyone, I told you so- LLMs can't reason, existing techniques are trash, clearly inferior to the techniques at…

The statement is part of a public discourse on AI techniques, specifically addressing a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the speaker's views on deep learning. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify the speaker's position.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying a misunderstanding rather than attacking others. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by correcting a misinterpretation of the speaker's views. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the content of the discussion rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
The statement acknowledges a potential miscommunication and corrects it, demonstrating accountability. [+1]