The statement expresses a critical and somewhat provocative opinion regarding potential appointments by a political figure to significant scientific positions. It suggests a sense of foreboding or concern about the impact of these appointments on the scientific community.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies potential negative consequences for the scientific community, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the individuals potentially involved in the appointments. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on inciting concern or fear. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a provocative assertion without offering a basis for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness of potential political impacts on science, but it does so in a way that may not be constructive.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its provocative nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.