Andrew Maynard
@2020science
·
452d
The statement expresses concern about potential appointments to key scientific positions under the Trump administration, suggesting widespread implications for various sectors reliant on science.
- The statement uses strong language ('terrified') which could be seen as fear-inducing, potentially causing harm by inciting panic. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on fear rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead it uses a fear-based approach without offering solutions or engaging with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to raise awareness about the importance of scientific appointments, but does so through fear rather than positive advocacy.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility by using fear-inducing language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.