In reply to:
CaseStudyQB - #ArmsEmbargoNOW
@CaseStudyQB
·
435d
The statement expresses disappointment regarding a public figure, Lina Khan, and her potential departure due to political pressure. It references public figures JD Vance and Matt Gaetz, indicating an expectation based on their support. The statement engages with a public issue related to political influence on regulatory bodies, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language and simply expresses disappointment, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.