In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising, a public policy concern in the United States and New Zealand.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy issue, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing factual information about the unique status of the U.S. and New Zealand regarding pharmaceutical ads. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks and maintains a focus on the policy issue, adhering to constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for the removal of pharmaceutical ads, the statement uses influence to suggest a societal improvement. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss a public policy issue, upholding the principle of integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.