In reply to:
Stoikus
@Stoikus10
·
400d
The statement is part of a conversation discussing the influence of corporate powers on democracy, which constitutes public discourse as it addresses societal issues and public concerns.
- The statement does not use harmful language and suggests a need for change, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the need for change, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with the need for change without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal change, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a discussion on public issues, aligning with the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.