In reply to:
EifelPlatt
@eifelplatt
·
400d
The statement is a sarcastic response to a discussion about the influence of corporate powers in politics, specifically questioning the idea that Trump could challenge this corporatocracy. It engages with a public issue concerning political influence and power dynamics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm, which could be perceived as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The sarcastic tone does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it may shut down further dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses sarcasm, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.