Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 67
11/24/2024, 9:31:59 AM
X
In reply to:
Zhana Vrangalova, PhD
@DrZhana
·
397d
@marwilliamson Hm.. I disagree. Too many people don't have the luxury of quietly processing this accurately. Most Dem voters have NO idea what just happened to us. They're completely unaware of the corporate capture of the Dem party, have cut off anyone who voted differently, siloed themselves…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
397d
@DrZhana I think we process in the quiet of our own hearts and minds. It’s not how wide, it’s how deep we go. The change doesn’t originate on the horizontal, but on the vertical axis. What you and I are talking about right now is a conversation millions of people are having in their own…
Zhana Vrangalova, PhD
@DrZhana
·
397d
@marwilliamson Also, how do we process in a way that's organized and systematic so not only intellectual clarity but also organized action comes out of it? TY
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
397d
@DrZhana I don’t think any of us know yet. Millions of us are processing all this, and the processing has to come before we can have any sense of clear direction. Many elected Democrats are now saying out loud what they should’ve been saying for years, but it remains to be seen whether…
Zhana Vrangalova, PhD
@DrZhana
·
397d
@marwilliamson It seems pretty clear to me that the Dem leadership is not willing to learn the lessons from this election or give up control. The corporate money is too good, they're ok with managed decline for the rest of us. And the Orwellian level of information manipulation they've been…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
397d
A matrix of corporate powers - insurance companies, Big Pharma, Big Food, big chemical companies, gun manufacturers, Big Oil and defense contractors - effectively own this country.
🧵

The statement is part of a broader discussion on political awareness and the influence of corporate powers on the Democratic Party. It critiques the readiness of people to engage in deep political analysis and action, suggesting a focus on the process of understanding rather than immediate widespread engagement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies a judgment on people's readiness, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by focusing on the importance of deep analysis, but it lacks empathy towards those it deems unready.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could be more constructive by acknowledging different perspectives. [-1]