Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 67
11/24/2024, 9:32:37 AM
X
In reply to:
bebeballena
@bebeballena
·
397d
@marwilliamson @kurtgx Didn't Citizens United pass in 2010, under Obama's watch...? 🤔
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
397d
@kurtgx It might set the government back on course in certain ways, but it in some ways it seems to me to be heading in a very wrong direction.

Overturning Citizens United would be the best thing in the world, but again… It’s the conservatives on SCOTUS that would never do that
Kurt
@kurtgx
·
397d
@marwilliamson Don’t discount the possibility that Donald Trump‘s Department of Government Efficiency will help set the goverment back on the right course.

The overturning of Citizen’s United would help massively, as well.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
397d
A matrix of corporate powers - insurance companies, Big Pharma, Big Food, big chemical companies, gun manufacturers, Big Oil and defense contractors - effectively own this country.
🧵

The statement is part of a public discourse discussing the influence of the Supreme Court and the Citizens United decision, which are significant public issues. The tone is corrective, aiming to clarify a misconception about the appointment of Supreme Court justices.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a misconception about the Supreme Court appointments, which can foster a more informed discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a factual inaccuracy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]