Department of Government Efficiency
@DOGE
·
239d
The statement critiques government spending, particularly on a Super Bowl ad for the Census, suggesting that such expenditures are inappropriate. It engages in public discourse by addressing government fiscal policies and their implications for taxpayers.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of government spending priorities.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of government spending but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question government spending, potentially encouraging public scrutiny and debate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on government spending, using the platform responsibly to raise awareness. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.