End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
·
239d
The statement critiques federal spending on the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, suggesting it is unauthorized and wasteful. It implies that cutting this funding would not harm anyone, engaging in a public debate about government spending and media funding.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies that cutting funding will not harm anyone, which could be seen as dismissive of potential impacts on public broadcasting services. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a public entity and its funding.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on cutting funding without discussing potential consequences. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of federal spending but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment through reduced spending. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on public spending, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform are not clearly demonstrated.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.