Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 212
11/30/2024, 3:01:23 PM
X
In reply to:
David R Bradley
@DavidRBradley
·
42d
@marwilliamson That's actually been the policy of the last 4 years.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
42d
Hating on Americans and calling it good government.
ProPublica
@propublica
·
42d
“We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” said Trump cabinet pick Russell Vought. “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down."…

The statement by @DavidRBradley ('Though you cannot name one example') is a part of a public discourse as it engages in a debate about government policies and their impact on Americans, which is a societal issue. The tone is dismissive and challenges the previous statement without providing substantive evidence or examples.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the previous claim without providing evidence or engaging in a meaningful discussion, which could be seen as a minor violation of the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]