Reposted by Marianne Williamson
The statement 'Free Peltier' along with the link to an article about Amnesty International urging President Biden to grant clemency to Leonard Peltier constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue concerning justice, human rights, and the use of presidential clemency.
- The statement does not cause harm and aligns with advocating for justice and human rights, which is a positive use of words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes empathy and compassion by highlighting the plight of an ailing, elderly activist and urging clemency. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it is a call to action based on a human rights perspective. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by supporting a cause related to justice and human rights. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to address a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.