Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 212
11/30/2024, 6:12:22 PM
X
In reply to:
David R Bradley
@DavidRBradley
·
42d
@marwilliamson Calling the MSG rally and all attendees Nazis and Nazi sympathizors was a great way to level up the deplorables.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
42d
@DavidRBradley Though you cannot name one example
David R Bradley
@DavidRBradley
·
42d
@marwilliamson That's actually been the policy of the last 4 years.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
42d
Hating on Americans and calling it good government.
ProPublica
@propublica
·
42d
“We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” said Trump cabinet pick Russell Vought. “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down."…

The statement 'That’s not policy. It’s just language' is part of a broader conversation about political rhetoric and its implications. It engages with the public discourse by addressing the nature of political statements and their impact on public perception and policy. The tone is dismissive, suggesting that the previous statement lacks substantive policy content.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the previous statement's seriousness, which could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the previous statement without further explanation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the previous statement without providing a reasoned argument. [-1]