Marianne Williamson

The statement engages in a discussion about the use of language in media and politics, comparing MSNBC and Donald Trump. It addresses public concerns about media bias and political rhetoric, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, aiming to highlight perceived equivalence in the use of 'vile language' by both parties.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but implies a negative view of both MSNBC and Donald Trump, suggesting they use vile language equally. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the parties involved by labeling their language as vile. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing language use rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions, and it borders on personal attacks by labeling language as vile. [-1]