Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 199
11/30/2024, 7:54:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Steve- NC plebeian.
@abetterworld98
·
43d
@marwilliamson The top third of the management/appointees needs to be replaced. They will resist change and just wait out any new administration as they outlast presidents.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
43d
@abetterworld98 Until you figure out who is creating that narrative and why. The system is plenty corrupt, don’t get me wrong. But the corruption does not lie with people who make $100,000 a year. The corruption is at a much higher level,
Steve- NC plebeian.
@abetterworld98
·
43d
@marwilliamson Hating on a corrupt system is a good thing.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
43d
Hating on Americans and calling it good government.
ProPublica
@propublica
·
43d
“We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” said Trump cabinet pick Russell Vought. “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down."…

The statement by @abetterworld98 engages in public discourse by discussing the appointment and replacement of government officials, which is a substantive issue related to governance and public administration. The tone is informative and aims to clarify a point about the natural turnover in government positions with each new administration.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, simply stating a fact about government operations.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does provide factual information that could contribute to a better understanding of government processes.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a focus on the process rather than individuals. [+1]