Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
12/14/2024, 1:34:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Jeff Graw
@JeffGraw
·
421d
@GaryMarcus You're shadow boxing. Elon didn't say the car is fully trustworthy. If he had, I'd be right there with you.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
421d
@JeffGraw Either you pay attention 100% because the car is not fully trustworthy, or you have genuine autonomy.

Everything in between is just driver assist, and as it becomes near perfect people stop paying attention, and that’s dangerous.
Jeff Graw
@JeffGraw
·
421d
@GaryMarcus Oh, you're back. Had a feeling.

So, consider that the inverse, if it fails one a route one time in 100, also doesn't mean that FSD can't you drive you from a residential origin in one city to a residential destination in another.

From what we've seen of FSD 13, it will probably…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
421d
Oh come on, this is a total fallacy.

Driving a given route once successfully does not entail being able to drive that same route reliably. (And doing it in clear weather in California doesn’t mean you can do it under different conditions, other pairs of cities etc.)
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
422d
Your Tesla can now drive you from your house in one complex city to another house in a different complex city

The statement critiques the claim about Tesla's autonomous driving capabilities, emphasizing the lack of context regarding conditions and reliability. It challenges the notion of full autonomy without qualifications, highlighting potential safety concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by questioning the reliability of autonomous driving claims, which could impact safety. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the need for context in claims about technology. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism, addressing the argument rather than attacking individuals. [+1]