Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 84

@aki_ranin We will advance somehow, but precisely as I was saying not simply by scaling data and compute.

You are stripping the term of its specific meaning and just saying we will someday make advances, which nobody would dispute.

12/14/2024, 3:06:08 AM

In reply to:

Aki Ranin

@aki_ranin

421d

@GaryMarcus Ilya at NeuraIPS makes a strong case that despite pre-training and data becoming “fossil fuels”, scaling will continue in agents, reasoning, and synthetic data.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

421d

Looks like this turned out to be wrong.

Tsarathustra

@tsarnick

700d

There is no limit: Dario Amodei says that even without better algorithms, scaling will continue to lead to amazing improvements in AI models

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the future of AI development, specifically addressing the debate on whether scaling data and compute will continue to drive advancements. It critiques the oversimplification of the term 'advances' and contributes to the ongoing dialogue about AI's trajectory.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the content of the argument rather than personal attacks.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement aims to clarify and deepen understanding of the topic by challenging a potentially vague assertion, promoting a more precise discourse. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the argument rather than attacking the individual, thus adhering to the principle of engaging in dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]