Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement critiques the bureaucratic inefficiencies in NYC's police department, highlighting the excessive paperwork required by the 'How Many Stops Act.' It uses humor and a reference to Kafka to emphasize the absurdity of the situation.
- The statement uses humor to highlight inefficiencies, which could be seen as constructive criticism rather than harmful. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By pointing out bureaucratic inefficiencies, it may promote understanding of the challenges faced by police officers. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the system rather than individuals, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.