Department of Government Efficiency
@DOGE
·
193d
The statement criticizes a federal grant aimed at supporting LGBTQI+ family programs, suggesting it is a misuse of taxpayer money. The tone is critical and dismissive, indicating disagreement with the allocation of funds for this purpose.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it dismisses the value of the program, which could indirectly harm those who benefit from such support. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it lacks respect for the dignity of the program's beneficiaries. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards the LGBTQI+ community or military families involved. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it labels the grant as 'indefensible' without providing a rationale or engaging with opposing views. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to criticize government spending but does not contribute to societal betterment by offering constructive alternatives or solutions. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster informed discussion or understanding. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.