Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -74
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
280d
If our military is truly under civilian control then it must finally share with Congress, as Art. 1 of our Constitution demands, what it knows about these anomalous phenomena and stop hiding info behind classified briefings that its spox can’t or wont even defend publicly.
12/18/2024, 1:22:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
280d
If you are in the military, Intelligence Community, or other US government agency and know something about these drones, please contact me to shine the light on the wrongdoing.

Encrypted email: michaelshellenberger@proton.me

I will go to prison to protect my sources.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
280d
From Biden to Mayorkas to DOD spokesperson, the US government officials are flagrantly lying to the American people and nobody knows this more than US military base commanders and the men and women who work in the military.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
280d
Biden says there’s no “sense of danger” in the repeated invasions of the air space above homes and military bases by unidentified drones. That’s a ridiculous and terrifying lie. Of course there is. Protecting our air space has been one of America’s highest priorities for 80 years
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
280d
The DOD-FBI-DHS-FAA say they thoroughly investigated all ~6,000 drone reports, but there’s no way they could have. They’re lying because, apparently, they don’t want to talk about why they can’t control the airspace above either our military bases or our residential areas.

The statement accuses the Department of Defense (DOD) and other agencies of withholding information from Congress, suggesting a violation of constitutional duties. It implies a lack of transparency and accountability in government actions regarding drone sightings, raising concerns about national security and governmental oversight.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold government agencies accountable, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but challenges the dignity of officials by accusing them of lying, which could be seen as a violation of this principle. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of government actions, which is constructive if based on evidence, but the accusatory tone may border on personal attacks. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses the platform to address a public concern, potentially contributing to societal betterment by advocating for transparency. [+1]