Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47

Score -74

They can’t have it both ways: if there’s no national security threat, then DOD has no excuse not to release the information. We the people rule the military, it doesn’t rule us.

@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG

12/18/2024, 1:28:49 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

279d

DOD is actively hiding info from Congress and thus is in direct violation of Article I of the US Constitution.

The heads of FBI and DHS are refusing to testify and DoD won’t even say why the briefings are classified.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

280d

If our military is truly under civilian control then it must finally share with Congress, as Art. 1 of our Constitution demands, what it knows about these anomalous phenomena and stop hiding info behind classified briefings that its spox can’t or wont even defend publicly.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

279d

If you are in the military, Intelligence Community, or other US government agency and know something about these drones, please contact me to shine the light on the wrongdoing.

Encrypted email: michaelshellenberger@proton.me

I will go to prison to protect my sources.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

279d

From Biden to Mayorkas to DOD spokesperson, the US government officials are flagrantly lying to the American people and nobody knows this more than US military base commanders and the men and women who work in the military.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

279d

Biden says there’s no “sense of danger” in the repeated invasions of the air space above homes and military bases by unidentified drones. That’s a ridiculous and terrifying lie. Of course there is. Protecting our air space has been one of America’s highest priorities for 80 years

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

280d

The DOD-FBI-DHS-FAA say they thoroughly investigated all ~6,000 drone reports, but there’s no way they could have. They’re lying because, apparently, they don’t want to talk about why they can’t control the airspace above either our military bases or our residential areas.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of government transparency and accountability regarding national security and military information. It questions the Department of Defense's (DOD) withholding of information and emphasizes civilian oversight of the military.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement challenges the DOD's actions, suggesting they may be harmful by withholding information, but it does not directly promote harm.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of the DOD and government officials, but it does not resort to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on policy and accountability. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to advocate for transparency and accountability, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]