Michael Schellenberger

The statement and conversation involve a discussion about drone incursions over sensitive areas, raising concerns about national security and government transparency. The tone is critical and seeks accountability from government agencies, suggesting a lack of transparency and potential constitutional violations.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential security threats, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by raising awareness. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The conversation respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional accountability rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions, encouraging dialogue and transparency. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to advocate for government accountability and transparency, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]