Michael Schellenberger

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -71
12/18/2024, 2:19:02 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo @MvonRen https://x.com/shellenberger/stat…
MarikvR
@MvonRen
·
279d
Chris nails it here.

And there’s much more:

-CO/WY/NE: Hovered over nuclear sites; “30-50” circling a large “mothership,” no sound

-SoCal: Omaha swarmed by brightly-lit objects 100+ mi offshore; 2 documented transmedium events (one involving a sphere moving against 40 kt wind)
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo “An unknown actor appears to be sending a stark message: ‘We can operate drone-like vehicles in American skies, over critical infrastructure and hover even above sensitive military facilities with complete impunity.’” @MvonRen

No big whoop though
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG Excellent @ChrisCuomo
Christopher C. Cuomo
@ChrisCuomo
·
279d
What happened in the classified drone briefing today? We found out the details from both a Democrat and a Republican to keep everything on the same page.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG One of the problems with the DOD et al violating its Constitutional duty is that various people including local politicians introducing conspiracy theories that not only have zero evidence but are in fact contradicted by the evidence.
UAP James
@UAPJames
·
278d
NEW: “Drones Are Definitely Govt Assets”

“There’s only one reason why these things are out there on patrol – they’re either looking or sniffing for something.”

“New Jersey mayors were lied to on Monday on a call with the White House.”

— Belleville NJ Mayor @MichaelMelham
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
They can’t have it both ways: if there’s no national security threat, then DOD has no excuse not to release the information. We the people rule the military, it doesn’t rule us.

@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
DOD is actively hiding info from Congress and thus is in direct violation of Article I of the US Constitution.

The heads of FBI and DHS are refusing to testify and DoD won’t even say why the briefings are classified.

The statement and conversation involve a discussion on national security, specifically regarding drone incursions over sensitive areas, and the Department of Defense's (DOD) handling of related information. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses government transparency, national security, and public accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about national security and government transparency, aiming to hold the DOD accountable, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for public safety. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The discussion respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional accountability rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the DOD, urging transparency and accountability without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By calling for transparency and accountability, the statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment through government accountability. [+1]