Michael Schellenberger

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -71
GrilledCheeze
@grilledmfcheeze
·
278d
@shellenberger If there's no sense of danger then why would I be immediately arrested if I few a tiny consumer drone over an NFL game without permission?
12/18/2024, 2:33:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@DeptofDefense I hope NJ mayors, legislators and representatives to Congress will continue to focus on demanding the government tell the truth rather than speculate about various scary sounding things without reliable information.
UAP James
@UAPJames
·
278d
NEW: “Drones Are Definitely Govt Assets”

“There’s only one reason why these things are out there on patrol – they’re either looking or sniffing for something.”

“New Jersey mayors were lied to on Monday on a call with the White House.”

— Belleville NJ Mayor @MichaelMelham
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
I'm sure they'll be right back to me with honest answers given how important protecting US air space, telling the truth, and transparency are to the @DeptofDefense
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo @MvonRen Could have had me fooled
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo @MvonRen huh
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo @MvonRen https://x.com/shellenberger/stat…
MarikvR
@MvonRen
·
278d
Chris nails it here.

And there’s much more:

-CO/WY/NE: Hovered over nuclear sites; “30-50” circling a large “mothership,” no sound

-SoCal: Omaha swarmed by brightly-lit objects 100+ mi offshore; 2 documented transmedium events (one involving a sphere moving against 40 kt wind)
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo “An unknown actor appears to be sending a stark message: ‘We can operate drone-like vehicles in American skies, over critical infrastructure and hover even above sensitive military facilities with complete impunity.’” @MvonRen

No big whoop though

The statement and conversation involve a critique of government transparency and accountability regarding drone incursions in U.S. airspace. The tone is skeptical and critical, questioning the Department of Defense's handling of the situation and the information provided to the public.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement questions government actions, potentially aiming to hold them accountable, which aligns with striving to do no harm by seeking truth. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public officials and agencies rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by encouraging transparency and truth from the government. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism, questioning government actions without personal attacks. [+1]