Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -44
12/18/2024, 2:34:15 PM
X
In reply to:
The Magalorian
@UltraMagalorian
·
278d
@shellenberger If you had given me the choice of fending off Drones or being ruled by the Biden administration, I’d vote the drone invasion.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
Biden says there’s no “sense of danger” in the repeated invasions of the air space above homes and military bases by unidentified drones. That’s a ridiculous and terrifying lie. Of course there is. Protecting our air space has been one of America’s highest priorities for 80 years
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
The DOD-FBI-DHS-FAA say they thoroughly investigated all ~6,000 drone reports, but there’s no way they could have. They’re lying because, apparently, they don’t want to talk about why they can’t control the airspace above either our military bases or our residential areas.

The statement is a satirical response to a political issue regarding drone invasions and the Biden administration. It uses humor to express dissatisfaction with the current administration, implying a preference for dealing with drones over being governed by them.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses humor and does not directly harm others, but it could be seen as undermining serious discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it could be interpreted as disrespectful to the administration.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote constructive dialogue and instead uses sarcasm to express disagreement. [-1]