Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -44
12/18/2024, 2:34:45 PM
X
In reply to:
JPButter
@BlueUnchecked
·
278d
@shellenberger Congress is receiving classified briefings on events that pose no danger to the nation.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
Biden says there’s no “sense of danger” in the repeated invasions of the air space above homes and military bases by unidentified drones. That’s a ridiculous and terrifying lie. Of course there is. Protecting our air space has been one of America’s highest priorities for 80 years
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
The DOD-FBI-DHS-FAA say they thoroughly investigated all ~6,000 drone reports, but there’s no way they could have. They’re lying because, apparently, they don’t want to talk about why they can’t control the airspace above either our military bases or our residential areas.

The statement and conversation involve a critique of government transparency and national security, specifically regarding drone sightings and airspace control. The tone is critical and suggests distrust in official statements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about national security, which could be seen as an attempt to do no harm by highlighting potential risks. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it questions the integrity of government agencies, which could impact their perceived dignity.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of government actions, which is constructive if it encourages accountability, but it risks being seen as a personal attack if not substantiated. [-1]