Michael Schellenberger

The statement uses sarcasm to question the trustworthiness of the intelligence community, implying skepticism about its honesty. This is part of a broader discussion on transparency and accountability in government, particularly regarding drone sightings and airspace security.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but uses sarcasm to critique the intelligence community.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but challenges the integrity of public institutions.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   Engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, using sarcasm instead. [-1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   Aims to hold public institutions accountable, promoting transparency. [+1]