Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -40
12/18/2024, 3:10:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
psyop's going great
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense Neither Congress nor the media nor the public are buying it. The only people selling it are tools. Thank you @mtgreenee
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
@RepMTG
·
278d
The American people are greatly concerned about the unidentified drones flying over the Northeast.

We’ve asked everyone for a classified briefing, and members of Congress are still in the dark.

But my understanding is that the Biden administration would just tell us the same…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense As Thomas Jefferson famously said, “Trust the government and the experts, they know best. The people are hysterical and stupid and can’t be trusted to know what’s really going on.”
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense everything’s fine trust the intelligence community when has it ever lied
Mark Satter
@marksatter
·
278d
The House Intelligence Committee just wrapped its classified briefing on the drone situation in New Jersey.

The overwhelming consensus from members: there’s nothing nefarious going on in the skies there.

Most sightings appear to be manned aircraft, stars, etc., they say.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense 😏
GrilledCheeze
@grilledmfcheeze
·
277d
@shellenberger If there's no sense of danger then why would I be immediately arrested if I few a tiny consumer drone over an NFL game without permission?
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense I hope NJ mayors, legislators and representatives to Congress will continue to focus on demanding the government tell the truth rather than speculate about various scary sounding things without reliable information.

The statement and its context involve a discussion on military psychological operations, public affairs, and transparency in government communications, particularly regarding drones. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, questioning the integrity and transparency of the Department of Defense and the intelligence community.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement questions government transparency, which can be seen as promoting accountability, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for truth. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The sarcastic tone may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of government actions, which is constructive, but the sarcasm could detract from a respectful dialogue.