Michael Schellenberger

The statement and the accompanying conversations engage in public discourse by addressing concerns about government transparency and accountability regarding drone sightings. The tone is skeptical and critical, questioning the government's narrative and demanding more information.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement challenges government transparency, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for truth. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The discourse respects privacy but is critical of public officials, which is a common aspect of public accountability. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by questioning official narratives, though it uses sarcasm, which may not foster empathy.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the government, which is constructive in seeking answers but uses sarcasm and mockery, which could be seen as personal attacks. [-1]