Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -44
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d

The statement is a critical response to government and media narratives regarding drone sightings, suggesting skepticism and distrust. It uses sarcasm and dismissive language, indicating frustration with perceived misinformation or lack of transparency.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses dismissive language, which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of 'tools' could be seen as disrespectful, slightly violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses sarcasm and personal attacks, violating the principle of constructive criticism. [-2]