Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -44

The statement is a supportive reply to a tweet by a public figure, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, expressing concern about unidentified drones and the lack of information provided to Congress. The original tweet addresses a public issue related to national security and government transparency, thus constituting public discourse. The reply itself, consisting of clapping emojis, does not substantively engage with the issue but shows agreement or support.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The reply does not cause harm with words or actions, as it simply shows support.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The reply respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in harassment or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The reply does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it lacks substantive content. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The reply does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is merely an expression of support without further discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The reply does not use influence for societal betterment, as it does not contribute to the discourse meaningfully. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The reply upholds free speech principles but does not use the platform to engage responsibly with the issue.